Print

Please login or register.
1 Hour 1 Day 1 Week 1 Month Forever
Login with username, password and session length

[ngrainqey]

There's no substitute for cubic inches....

lol which is why in places i can have the 2.0t vag cars
anyway after buying my volvo i quite like the idea of getting more of the potential out of the car, makes it more efficient too in theory (in practise though it often has adverse effects)
anyway... would you really want to race a 4.6 range rover against my volvo?

[VXL V6]

There's no substitute for cubic inches....

lol which is why in places i can have the 2.0t vag cars
anyway after buying my volvo i quite like the idea of getting more of the potential out of the car, makes it more efficient too in theory (in practise though it often has adverse effects)
anyway... would you really want to race a 4.6 range rover against my volvo?

Not really a challenge for Santa Pod is it!  

When it comes to towing a horse box though i'd use the Range Rover everytime  

[iainb]

http://www.bowler-offroad.com/Wildcat%20entrylevel02.htm
Id put this 4.6 up against the Volvo !

[VXL V6]

http://www.bowler-offroad.com/Wildcat%20entrylevel02.htm
Id put this 4.6 up against the Volvo !

That's the one that turned Hamster into 'a driving God' isn't it?

[Martin_1962]

I have to ask, where is the 4.4 engine coming from as these were only ever in production in oz unless its a 3.5 with a stroker kit fitted!

For info

4.0 (its actualy a 3.95 litre engine and the same capacity as the earlier 3.9 units) - 190 Bhp - 320Nm torque

4.6 - 225 Bhp - 380Nm torque.

i have to laugh, i can get both more power and torque out of my 2.4t after remapping and have nearly the same power as standard

Put an interesting cam in the 4.6 then

[Martin_1962]

There's no substitute for cubic inches....

lol which is why in places i can have the 2.0t vag cars
anyway after buying my volvo i quite like the idea of getting more of the potential out of the car, makes it more efficient too in theory (in practise though it often has adverse effects)
anyway... would you really want to race a 4.6 range rover against my volvo?

On the mud definately

[Marks DTM Calib]

There's no substitute for cubic inches....

lol which is why in places i can have the 2.0t vag cars
anyway after buying my volvo i quite like the idea of getting more of the potential out of the car, makes it more efficient too in theory (in practise though it often has adverse effects)
anyway... would you really want to race a 4.6 range rover against my volvo?

Who told you that crap!

[bertiecbx550]

You should listen to MrDTM he`s scotty in disguise....