Omega Owners Forum

Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  

News:

Please check the Forum Guidelines at the top of the Newbie section

Pages: [1]   Go Down

Author Topic: Vectra 3.2 pros/cons  (Read 2427 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Ned Kelly

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • Salisbury
  • Posts: 16
    • View Profile
Vectra 3.2 pros/cons
« on: 03 December 2009, 19:12:48 »
I have a Omega 2.6 but want to add a Vectra 3.2. Does anyone have any ideas on the downside to owning apart from fuel/insurance. Thanks :D
Logged

rob in gib

  • Senior Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • Plymouth
  • Posts: 584
    • Jaguar S type 3.0
    • View Profile
Re: Vectra 3.2 pros/cons
« Reply #1 on: 03 December 2009, 19:28:54 »
The biggest down side is it`s not a MIGGY

lol :y
Logged
Just chilling in the sun. I wish back in the rain like everybody else

Ned Kelly

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • Salisbury
  • Posts: 16
    • View Profile
Re: Vectra 3.2 pros/cons
« Reply #2 on: 03 December 2009, 19:47:46 »
Thanks Rob but neither is your Toyota. Saw a 3.2 couple of days ago and just :y wondered !! Didn't want to jump into the deep end.
Logged

rob in gib

  • Senior Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • Plymouth
  • Posts: 584
    • Jaguar S type 3.0
    • View Profile
Re: Vectra 3.2 pros/cons
« Reply #3 on: 03 December 2009, 19:51:15 »
Quote
Thanks Rob but neither is your Toyota. Saw a 3.2 couple of days ago and just :y wondered !! Didn't want to jump into the deep end.


Will have to agree but not even the mighty mig can tow in excess of 2 tonne offroad :y :y :y :y
Logged
Just chilling in the sun. I wish back in the rain like everybody else

omegadan67

  • Junior Member
  • **
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • northampton
  • Posts: 239
    • View Profile
Re: Vectra 3.2 pros/cons
« Reply #4 on: 03 December 2009, 19:59:50 »
front wheel drive,not as spacious for driver and passengers a bit tinny these are the cons imho.

pros are great drivers car better handling than the omegas hatchback practacality
Logged
A little infomation is dangerous in the wrong hands

Martin_1962

  • Guest
Re: Vectra 3.2 pros/cons
« Reply #5 on: 03 December 2009, 20:38:41 »
Well use your inlet ducting off the 2.6, if you have auto I would recommend getting an AR35.

Might be easier to use an Omega 3.2 rather than the Vectra version
Logged

Del Boy

  • Omega Queen
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • Kent, UK.
  • Posts: 10804
    • 2012 '62' BMW 730d MSport
    • View Profile
Re: Vectra 3.2 pros/cons
« Reply #6 on: 03 December 2009, 21:19:52 »
Don't get a veccy auto whatever you do, manuals are not bad though :y
Logged
Drives: 2013 (13) BMW 530d M Sport Touring, 2011 '61' BMW 520d SE.

pedroMV6

  • Omega Knight
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • York
  • Posts: 1207
  • Der Metzgermeister
    • View Profile
Re: Vectra 3.2 pros/cons
« Reply #7 on: 03 December 2009, 22:10:16 »
Plenty of cons - can't think of any pros.............

Logged
Loving the Vectra C 2.2 diesel!

tunnie

  • Get A Life!!
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • Surrey
  • Posts: 37547
    • Zafira Tourer & BMW 435i
    • View Profile
Re: Vectra 3.2 pros/cons
« Reply #8 on: 03 December 2009, 22:34:10 »
Quote
The biggest down side is it`s not a MIGGY

lol :y

I am really beginning to hate that term now, why is half the forum calling it that?  :-/

3.2 VectraC has trouble putting the power down, 210bhp and FWD don't go well together. Its a much harsher ride as well, thanks to it being FWD.

It will be more expensive than the Omega to buy, insure, and run, it will eat through a set of fronts in no time.

If you want a VectraC, get the 1.9 CDTi and go for economy, if you want power, get the Omega.
Logged

Omega3

  • Junior Member
  • **
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • Hertfordshire
  • Posts: 134
    • View Profile
Re: Vectra 3.2 pros/cons
« Reply #9 on: 03 December 2009, 22:59:37 »
Quote
front wheel drive,not as spacious for driver and passengers a bit tinny these are the cons imho.

pros are great drivers car better handling than the omegas hatchback practacality
Omega will out handle Vectra all day. (Ask any Police Driver) FWD understeer ultimately slower, and far less enjoyable to drive on limit, will always run wide. Softer suspension on Omega more predictable on less than perfect sufaces. 3.2 Vectra lighter than Omega but torque steer and difficulty getting power down offsets this, RWD and weight shifting under acceleration give Omega the edge. Also for me the heavy transverse engine shunt spoils the V6 vectra for me when you're used to in line trasmissions.
Logged
Previously: Mercedes CLK 320cdi, Insignia SRi, 53 Omega 2.2CD, 02 3.2 elite, 01 Omega 2.2CD, 94 Omega 2.0 Est, Mercedes 300TE, Toyota Supra 3.0, Honda Legend Coupe, Supra 2.8i Mk2, Fiat X1/9, Lancia Trevi

Ian_D

  • Omega Baron
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • York
  • Posts: 2432
    • View Profile
Re: Vectra 3.2 pros/cons
« Reply #10 on: 03 December 2009, 23:39:02 »
Quote
Plenty of cons - can't think of any pros.............

 
I thought you might have something to say on this thread when I read the title!  ;D ;D ;)
Logged
[size=12]
LMF are utter rubbish - dont buy steering idlers from them! You've been warned![/size]

unlucky mark mv6

  • Omega Knight
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • tipton,west mids
  • Posts: 1904
    • View Profile
Re: Vectra 3.2 pros/cons
« Reply #11 on: 04 December 2009, 13:38:27 »
Quote
front wheel drive,not as spacious for driver and passengers a bit tinny these are the cons imho.

pros are great drivers car better handling than the omegas hatchback practacality
Ive always thought that saloons were better handling than hatchbacks,just my personal opinion. :y
Logged
Machine polishing in west mids £40 also body repairs.pm me for more info.

damage consultant

  • Junior Member
  • **
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • falkirk (sunny scotland)
  • Posts: 116
    • View Profile
Re: Vectra 3.2 pros/cons
« Reply #12 on: 04 December 2009, 20:04:03 »
only draw back is doing a clutch subframe out job :y
Logged

pedroMV6

  • Omega Knight
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • York
  • Posts: 1207
  • Der Metzgermeister
    • View Profile
Re: Vectra 3.2 pros/cons
« Reply #13 on: 04 December 2009, 23:05:14 »
Quote
only draw back is doing a clutch subframe out job :y

Try fitting a new alternator on a V6 V*ctra - you have to split the old one to get it out, then split the new one to fit it in then put it back together once the thing's almost in place. Really not a nice job.
I was really disappointed with my V6 V*ctra B - wanted one for years, got one went through two engines, an oil cooler, an alternator and gearbox selector switch. Had it 6 months, on the road for about 2.
When it drove, it was pretty quick, but handled pretty poorly compared to my MV6.
Ended up hating the bloody thing, ergo, ALL V*ctras are the work of Evangelists. :y
Logged
Loving the Vectra C 2.2 diesel!

pedroMV6

  • Omega Knight
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • York
  • Posts: 1207
  • Der Metzgermeister
    • View Profile
Re: Vectra 3.2 pros/cons
« Reply #14 on: 04 December 2009, 23:09:49 »
Quote
Quote
Plenty of cons - can't think of any pros.............

 
I thought you might have something to say on this thread when I read the title!  ;D ;D ;)

Can't think why, like! ;D
Logged
Loving the Vectra C 2.2 diesel!
Pages: [1]   Go Up
« previous next »
 

Page created in 0.017 seconds with 17 queries.