Omega Owners Forum

Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  

News:

Please play nicely.  No one wants to listen/read a keyboard warriors rants....

Pages: [1] 2  All   Go Down

Author Topic: tuning  (Read 4328 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

nemesis_v6

  • Junior Member
  • **
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • tiverton devon
  • Posts: 121
    • View Profile
tuning
« on: 17 April 2007, 02:31:25 »

i was just  wondering if anyone has tuned a 3lt v6 i would like about 300bhp if poss dose anyoneonehaveany tips amgoingtoget air filter exhustbut fromthere dont know
Logged

Admin

  • Administrator
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • 0
  • Posts: 2595
    • View Profile
Re: tuning
« Reply #1 on: 17 April 2007, 07:25:08 »

I hope you have VERY deep pockets then!  ;D

It is a normally aspirated engine, so gains are very limited.

Plenty of information on here about the limited gains available. Look at this thread.
http://www.omegaowners.com/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1176533616
Logged
The Administrator.

rpont

  • Intermediate Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • Tadcaster
  • Posts: 270
    • View Profile
Re: tuning
« Reply #2 on: 17 April 2007, 08:19:17 »

The air filter already there is very good and it draws cool air in from in front of the radiator. A cone filter in the engine bay will make things worse. Get a plastic drinks bottle, take the top off and run hot water down the sides. Put the top back on and let it cool and see how much it colapses. That's what happens to the air when you have a cone filter, you get less mass because it's hot.

Also the exhaust is already good. Have a look under the car at the size of the pipes on each side. They are large when you consider each one is carrying the exhaust from a 1.5l engine. The manifolds themselves are restrictive though and replacing them can help a little.

The engine has a high compression ratio of 10.8:1 so to super/turbo charge it you have to lower that first. It can be done but you are looking at 5-6k.

The best thing you can do for your money is making sure it has clean air and fuel filters. If the ones in there are old changing them can really make a difference.
Logged

sounds2k

  • Omega Knight
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Queenborough, Kent
  • Posts: 1005
    • Saabs and a Jag XFR
    • View Profile
Re: tuning
« Reply #3 on: 17 April 2007, 21:03:48 »

out of interest on that score, I presume the 2.6 & 3.2's are better for turbo/super charging as the compression ratio is already lower at 10.0:1

plus the 3.2 supposedly has a steel crank - not sure if the 2.6 has that too?
Logged

rpont

  • Intermediate Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • Tadcaster
  • Posts: 270
    • View Profile
Re: tuning
« Reply #4 on: 17 April 2007, 23:29:28 »

Quote
out of interest on that score, I presume the 2.6 & 3.2's are better for turbo/super charging as the compression ratio is already lower at 10.0:1

plus the 3.2 supposedly has a steel crank - not sure if the 2.6 has that too?
I'm not an expert, just quoting bits I remember from looking into it at one point and what I've picked up from here. I saw an interesting explanation within the last year but I can't remember if it was on here or not.

I think 11:1 is the maximum you should be aiming for or can have, sorry but I can't remember the reason. The turbo starts the compression before the air gets to the cylinder so the lower the number is in the cylinder the more you can compress things before it goes in and the bigger the bang. This would make the 10:1 ratio engines better but you only want the turbo to compress things by ten percent or so. If you have a ratio of 7:1 you can compress things a lot more. For a turbo to have a pressure of two atmospheres you need an original compression ratio of 5.5:1 for example so a 3.2l engine will burn as much fuel as a 6.4l one.

Hopefully I'm not too far wrong with that lot but someone will correct me if so I hope, all sorts of rubbish sticks in my brain but it doesn't always come back the same as it went in these days.
Logged

chris-b

  • Junior Member
  • **
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • Wirral
  • Posts: 62
    • View Profile
Re: tuning
« Reply #5 on: 17 April 2007, 23:47:55 »

Hi there,
 I have a Tuning chip installed, a 4 bar fuel regulator,magnecor leads and a Mantzal power resonator (copy), i had the original back in 2001 on my old Elite and my friend took the dimensions of it and had it made in stainless steel but never got around to fitting it so i have bought it all these years later from him and fitted it to my 3.0MV6,
now my problem is that i have on the end of it a cone filter but what you are saying is that i need to connect it to the air box and just have a panel filter? is that correct?
 now that i have all these tuning modds on the car, Do i need to get it on the rolling road and have it remapped to adjust to the changes?
Logged

bogit

  • Junior Member
  • **
  • Offline Offline
  • Northampton
  • Posts: 118
  • yes i do know its missing 2 wheels :)
    • View Profile
Re: tuning
« Reply #6 on: 18 April 2007, 08:07:23 »

courtney used to offer a turbo kit for the v6,then withdrew it form sale,as it kept blowing peoples engines up,ho hum lol
Logged
dash bulbs replaced,ecc sorted,atf to go, door blowers-maybe

Phil

  • Senior Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • 0
  • Posts: 799
    • View Profile
Re: tuning
« Reply #7 on: 18 April 2007, 08:32:42 »

Quote
courtney used to offer a turbo kit for the v6

They were actually supplied to the RUC. They were a LPT and IIRC only gave about 280ish bhp

If you want 300bhp, easiest and possibly the only real alternative is NOS, but you will prob take the engine home in a Tesco bag after a while
Logged

rpont

  • Intermediate Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • Tadcaster
  • Posts: 270
    • View Profile
Re: tuning
« Reply #8 on: 18 April 2007, 09:51:05 »

Quote

now my problem is that i have on the end of it a cone filter but what you are saying is that i need to connect it to the air box and just have a panel filter? is that correct?
 now that i have all these tuning modds on the car, Do i need to get it on the rolling road and have it remapped to adjust to the changes?
If the cone filter is just sitting under the bonnet it's unlikely to be doing you any good once the engine has warmed up since it will be pulling in air that has gone through the radiator. You may like the noise though  :)

The original air filter has a huge surface area of filter, take one apart and pull it open. When it's clean I don't think it can be beaten and when it isn't clean replace it. The MAF is sensitive to oil droplets from these oil cleanerd filters as well. If too much oil is left on the filter it can be sucked into the intake and get on the top surface of the MAF causing it to give wrong readings.

I don't know if it's worth the rolling road. If you happen to have one in your back garden it would be interesting to see what the difference is between the standard air filter and a cone filter once the engine is hot. I'm not convinced you can beat the VX one even with the bonnet open  :)

There is a chip that has been recommended but it's not the cheapest one I can't remember the name at the moment but do a search for something tek (maybe mtek?).
« Last Edit: 18 April 2007, 09:52:13 by rpont »
Logged

theolodian

  • Omega Baron
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • Warwickshire
  • Posts: 3654
  • I need a new avatar.
    • View Profile
Re: tuning
« Reply #9 on: 18 April 2007, 19:51:17 »

Quote
Quote
out of interest on that score, I presume the 2.6 & 3.2's are better for turbo/super charging as the compression ratio is already lower at 10.0:1

plus the 3.2 supposedly has a steel crank - not sure if the 2.6 has that too?
I'm not an expert, just quoting bits I remember from looking into it at one point and what I've picked up from here. I saw an interesting explanation within the last year but I can't remember if it was on here or not.

I think 11:1 is the maximum you should be aiming for or can have, sorry but I can't remember the reason. The turbo starts the compression before the air gets to the cylinder so the lower the number is in the cylinder the more you can compress things before it goes in and the bigger the bang. This would make the 10:1 ratio engines better but you only want the turbo to compress things by ten percent or so. If you have a ratio of 7:1 you can compress things a lot more. For a turbo to have a pressure of two atmospheres you need an original compression ratio of 5.5:1 for example so a 3.2l engine will burn as much fuel as a 6.4l one.

Hopefully I'm not too far wrong with that lot but someone will correct me if so I hope, all sorts of rubbish sticks in my brain but it doesn't always come back the same as it went in these days.
That's not quite true.  I have been in street cars running over 2bar on 9 or 10:1 CR, stock internals and normal petrol.  A short list of the issues involved are; where it makes boost, volumetric efficiency, charge air temps, pressure drops, ECU capability, and on and on.  However, turbo charging an engine that was not turbo'd to begin with is an easy way to waste a lot of time and money.  It can be done, but far easier to put on a supercharger at 0.3 to 0.5 bar with other normal bits and leave it at that.  That may not get you to 300 without a lot of octane boost, but going any further is orders of magnitude harder and more expensive.
Logged
Trains may have been invented here, but public transport is a foreign concept!

Dave-C

  • Omega Knight
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • Staffordshire
  • Posts: 1915
  • The Old Girl
    • View Profile
Re: tuning
« Reply #10 on: 18 April 2007, 20:09:47 »

I love speed too, just curious though why 300 bhp, are you planning a entering into a particular formula?  Surely a chip, induction kit and fuel reg will make enough bhp increase for road use, a 3.0l should make 245 bhp with this little lot I would have thought...  My Elite is more than enough for my requiremnts, with only a K&N panel in it ( Sharper throttle )...  I don't hang about either..

DC

Logged
Do it right, do it once................

nemesis_v6

  • Junior Member
  • **
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • tiverton devon
  • Posts: 121
    • View Profile
Re: tuning
« Reply #11 on: 19 April 2007, 02:20:13 »

i would like to do drag days but keep at a sensiable level bhp that is
Logged

Dave-C

  • Omega Knight
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • Staffordshire
  • Posts: 1915
  • The Old Girl
    • View Profile
Re: tuning
« Reply #12 on: 19 April 2007, 07:00:55 »

Read somewhere about a diff upgrade to change ratio for acceleration...

Anyone?

DC
Logged
Do it right, do it once................

TheBoy

  • Administrator
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • Brackley, Northants
  • Posts: 107023
  • I Like Lockdown
    • Whatever Starts
    • View Profile
Re: tuning
« Reply #13 on: 19 April 2007, 08:18:40 »

I believe lsd is lower ratio...
Logged
Grumpy old man

nemesis_v6

  • Junior Member
  • **
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • tiverton devon
  • Posts: 121
    • View Profile
Re: tuning
« Reply #14 on: 20 April 2007, 01:33:22 »

mine ex cop car so what changes have been done to car ive been told uprated cams chip remap is this true that this gets done my meega is very fast after 2500rpm and i think lsd diff as slips well but tips on how to tell if right would help thanks
Logged
Pages: [1] 2  All   Go Up
 

Page created in 0.012 seconds with 17 queries.