Omega Owners Forum

Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  

News:

Welcome to OOF

Pages: [1] 2  All   Go Down

Author Topic: 2.2 paperclip test  (Read 2730 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

silvershark

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • omagh, N.I.
  • Posts: 25
    • View Profile
2.2 paperclip test
« on: 27 April 2008, 11:39:02 »
Hi there does anybody hav a diagram of where the paperclip goes in on the 2.2petol.  I hav already done it on the 2.0l but the layout is not the same on the 2.2l

Help :-?
Logged

tunnie

  • Get A Life!!
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • Surrey
  • Posts: 37573
    • Zafira Tourer & BMW 435i
    • View Profile
Re: 2.2 paperclip test
« Reply #1 on: 27 April 2008, 11:40:19 »
you can't paperclip a 2.2

Only 2.0/2.5/3.0 petrols can be paper clipped.

Drive by wire engines, 2.2/2.6/3.2 cannot be paper clipped.

Need tech2, either real or cheapo
« Last Edit: 27 April 2008, 11:40:59 by tunnie »
Logged

Dazzler

  • Omega Baron
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • Haverhill, Suffolk
  • Posts: 4198
  • Drive it like you stole it......
    • View Profile
Re: 2.2 paperclip test
« Reply #2 on: 27 April 2008, 11:47:13 »
Quote
you can't paperclip a 2.2

Only 2.0/2.5/3.0 petrols can be paper clipped.

Drive by wire engines, 2.2/2.6/3.2 cannot be paper clipped.

Need tech2, either real or cheapo
As Mr Tunnie said ^^^^^^ ;)
Logged
Big jobbies now finished.....Now running on LPG

silvershark

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • omagh, N.I.
  • Posts: 25
    • View Profile
Re: 2.2 paperclip test
« Reply #3 on: 27 April 2008, 12:01:12 »
thanks for da help :y
Logged

Auto Addict

  • Administrator
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • North Birmingham
  • Posts: 13554
  • Back to Vx to keep TB happy
    • Astra K Elite ST
    • View Profile
Re: 2.2 paperclip test
« Reply #4 on: 27 April 2008, 17:53:53 »
Quote
thanks for da help :y

Are there problems with the 2.2?
Logged
I like red cars

silvershark

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • omagh, N.I.
  • Posts: 25
    • View Profile
Re: 2.2 paperclip test
« Reply #5 on: 27 April 2008, 18:41:48 »
the 2.2 is going fine thanks just wanted to cheak it out as i had done it on my 2.0l

here the code 0335 was comming up on my 2.0l in the code manual it said it was incorrect RPM signal, do u know what this means.

Logged

VXL V6

  • Omega Lord
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • Warwickshire
  • Posts: 9874
    • 530D M Sport, Elite 3.2
    • View Profile
Re: 2.2 paperclip test
« Reply #6 on: 27 April 2008, 18:45:05 »
Crank Sensor IIRC
Logged

silvershark

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • omagh, N.I.
  • Posts: 25
    • View Profile
Re: 2.2 paperclip test
« Reply #7 on: 27 April 2008, 18:54:10 »
the car is showing the cam sensor code 0340 as well would this be the norm with these? should i replace both and if so where is the crank sens located thanks.
Logged

VXL V6

  • Omega Lord
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • Warwickshire
  • Posts: 9874
    • 530D M Sport, Elite 3.2
    • View Profile
Re: 2.2 paperclip test
« Reply #8 on: 27 April 2008, 18:56:24 »
Cam Sensor far easier to replace than crank sensor, i'd do the cam sensor first and get the codes cleared and see what comes back.  :y
Logged

silvershark

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • omagh, N.I.
  • Posts: 25
    • View Profile
Re: 2.2 paperclip test
« Reply #9 on: 27 April 2008, 19:01:15 »
good idea im guessing they wont clear themselves when i replace the cam sensor? would it be worth my while to invest in a cheapy tech 2. :-/
Logged

VXL V6

  • Omega Lord
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • Warwickshire
  • Posts: 9874
    • 530D M Sport, Elite 3.2
    • View Profile
Re: 2.2 paperclip test
« Reply #10 on: 27 April 2008, 19:28:49 »
If the problem is resolved the EML will not illuminate anymore. It's possible that the engine management is getting confused as both sensors are required otherwise the car will go into 'limp home' mode.

Not unknown for both sensors to fail around the 40K marks. As it's far easier to replace the Cam sensor I would do that first (get a genuine one as the eBay ones aren't too wonderful) and see if the lamp goes out.

Is the car limited to 4000 RPM? This is the limp home mode.

Logged

silvershark

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • omagh, N.I.
  • Posts: 25
    • View Profile
Re: 2.2 paperclip test
« Reply #11 on: 27 April 2008, 19:42:51 »
yes it cuts out at 4500 rpm. it only started doing this today but when i did the paperclip test yesterday it gave me the cam sensor code 0340 but the eml wasnt on and had never come on. is it normal for the test to show codes even if the eml isnt on? :-?
Logged

TheBoy

  • Administrator
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • Brackley, Northants
  • Posts: 107031
  • I Like Lockdown
    • Whatever Starts
    • View Profile
Re: 2.2 paperclip test
« Reply #12 on: 27 April 2008, 19:45:08 »
Quote
yes it cuts out at 4500 rpm. it only started doing this today but when i did the paperclip test yesterday it gave me the cam sensor code 0340 but the eml wasnt on and had never come on. is it normal for the test to show codes even if the eml isnt on? :-?
0340 common on 4 cylinder omegas. Change cam sensor.  Pattern ones known to be troublesome sometimes, so stick to genuine.
Logged
Grumpy old man

VXL V6

  • Omega Lord
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • Warwickshire
  • Posts: 9874
    • 530D M Sport, Elite 3.2
    • View Profile
Re: 2.2 paperclip test
« Reply #13 on: 27 April 2008, 19:46:55 »
If eml isn't on then the code is stored but not current. Cam / crank sensor on 2.0 can often be ok from cold then flag codes when warm.

Perhaps best to get the codes cleared and see what comes back.
Logged

silvershark

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • omagh, N.I.
  • Posts: 25
    • View Profile
Re: 2.2 paperclip test
« Reply #14 on: 27 April 2008, 20:00:13 »
might just do that to be sure thank all.
Logged
Pages: [1] 2  All   Go Up
« previous next »
 

Page created in 0.014 seconds with 17 queries.