Omega Owners Forum

Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  

News:

Search the maintenance guides for answers to 99.999% of Omega questions

Pages: [1]   Go Down

Author Topic: PERFORMANCE FILTERS FOR 2.0 16V  (Read 1606 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

BIGHUCK

  • Junior Member
  • **
  • Offline Offline
  • west cumbria
  • Posts: 148
    • View Profile
PERFORMANCE FILTERS FOR 2.0 16V
« on: 02 July 2008, 12:01:52 »

HI, has anybody bought and fitted a performance filter or induction kit to a 2.0 16v,if so where can i get one and how much,thanks. :y
« Last Edit: 02 July 2008, 12:02:39 by BIGHUCK »
Logged

markey mark

  • Omega Baron
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • SLady bitshorpe north lincs
  • Posts: 4236
  • banned for repeatedly reneaging on deals.
    • View Profile
Re: PERFORMANCE FILTERS FOR 2.0 16V
« Reply #1 on: 02 July 2008, 12:04:07 »

same fitment as a vectra fella  :y
Logged

BIGHUCK

  • Junior Member
  • **
  • Offline Offline
  • west cumbria
  • Posts: 148
    • View Profile
Re: PERFORMANCE FILTERS FOR 2.0 16V
« Reply #2 on: 02 July 2008, 12:05:36 »

Quote
same fitment as a vectra fella  :y
spot on thanks
 :y
Logged

rickyboy

  • Senior Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • Glasgow
  • Posts: 807
    • View Profile
Re: PERFORMANCE FILTERS FOR 2.0 16V
« Reply #3 on: 02 July 2008, 12:24:22 »

Heard people mentioning it's a bad idea to get a cone filter which has to be oiled.  Very bad for the MAF sensor.  So be warned!
Logged

BIGHUCK

  • Junior Member
  • **
  • Offline Offline
  • west cumbria
  • Posts: 148
    • View Profile
Re: PERFORMANCE FILTERS FOR 2.0 16V
« Reply #4 on: 02 July 2008, 12:28:40 »

Quote
Heard people mentioning it's a bad idea to get a cone filter which has to be oiled.  Very bad for the MAF sensor.  So be warned!
i might just get a replacement performance panel filter then thanks for the advice its appreciated
 :y :y
Logged

106rallye

  • Junior Member
  • **
  • Offline Offline
  • Glasgow
  • Posts: 227
    • View Profile
Re: PERFORMANCE FILTERS FOR 2.0 16V
« Reply #5 on: 02 July 2008, 12:37:38 »

Quote
Quote
Heard people mentioning it's a bad idea to get a cone filter which has to be oiled.  Very bad for the MAF sensor.  So be warned!
i might just get a replacement performance panel filter then thanks for the advice its appreciated
 :y :y

replacement performance panel filters can be oiled as well, I know the K&N ones are.
Logged
sideways is the way forward!

BIGHUCK

  • Junior Member
  • **
  • Offline Offline
  • west cumbria
  • Posts: 148
    • View Profile
Re: PERFORMANCE FILTERS FOR 2.0 16V
« Reply #6 on: 02 July 2008, 12:41:59 »

Quote
Quote
Quote
Heard people mentioning it's a bad idea to get a cone filter which has to be oiled.  Very bad for the MAF sensor.  So be warned!
i might just get a replacement performance panel filter then thanks for the advice its appreciated
 :y :y

replacement performance panel filters can be oiled as well, I know the K&N ones are.
so do you reckon i should just leave it standard??? :-/
Logged

jonathanh

  • Omega Knight
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • coventry
  • Posts: 1199
    • View Profile
Re: PERFORMANCE FILTERS FOR 2.0 16V
« Reply #7 on: 02 July 2008, 13:02:41 »

yep - I think the filter is pretty free flowing and the same as on all models so if it can cope with the flow on a 3.0 I would guess that there's not much improvement to be had from standard.

ever thought of a V6?
Logged
parking near Birmingham airport for members with +250 posts.  PM for info

BIGHUCK

  • Junior Member
  • **
  • Offline Offline
  • west cumbria
  • Posts: 148
    • View Profile
Re: PERFORMANCE FILTERS FOR 2.0 16V
« Reply #8 on: 02 July 2008, 16:04:29 »

Quote
yep - I think the filter is pretty free flowing and the same as on all models so if it can cope with the flow on a 3.0 I would guess that there's not much improvement to be had from standard.

ever thought of a V6?
thats why i joined this forum common sense prevails i,ll leave it standard,thanks,, a v6 would be nice again i had one a couple of years back a cdx.!!!! :y :y
Logged

achoo81

  • Senior Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • Exmouth Devon
  • Posts: 725
    • View Profile
Re: PERFORMANCE FILTERS FOR 2.0 16V
« Reply #9 on: 02 July 2008, 20:29:10 »

I have a Pipercross free flow filter on my 3.0 ltr MV6 and it appears to have made some difference it's smoother and seems to have better acceleration, the other beauty of them is you never have to replace them just wash them in soapy water dry them and reoil them, no more buying air filters.
Logged

TheBoy

  • Administrator
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • Brackley, Northants
  • Posts: 106817
  • I Like Lockdown
    • Whatever Starts
    • View Profile
Re: PERFORMANCE FILTERS FOR 2.0 16V
« Reply #10 on: 02 July 2008, 20:37:32 »

Quote
I have a Pipercross free flow filter on my 3.0 ltr MV6 and it appears to have made some difference it's smoother and seems to have better acceleration, the other beauty of them is you never have to replace them just wash them in soapy water dry them and reoil them, no more buying air filters.
I've yet to see an aftermarket filter that makes a positive improvement, as the std one is bloody massive anyway.  Most have a detrimental affect on perfromance, though the noise may make you think otherwise.  On the bigger engines, there is more to be gained (and lost), unlike the OP's 2.0l.

As you're running an oiled filter, just be careful, as the expensive MAFs don't like the oil.

Hence I stick to the std, genuine part...
Logged
Grumpy old man

BIGHUCK

  • Junior Member
  • **
  • Offline Offline
  • west cumbria
  • Posts: 148
    • View Profile
Re: PERFORMANCE FILTERS FOR 2.0 16V
« Reply #11 on: 02 July 2008, 20:37:34 »

Quote
I have a Pipercross free flow filter on my 3.0 ltr MV6 and it appears to have made some difference it's smoother and seems to have better acceleration, the other beauty of them is you never have to replace them just wash them in soapy water dry them and reoil them, no more buying air filters.
food for thought i,ll look into it and see what happens thanks  mate:y :y
Logged

BIGHUCK

  • Junior Member
  • **
  • Offline Offline
  • west cumbria
  • Posts: 148
    • View Profile
Re: PERFORMANCE FILTERS FOR 2.0 16V
« Reply #12 on: 02 July 2008, 20:42:54 »

Quote
Quote
I have a Pipercross free flow filter on my 3.0 ltr MV6 and it appears to have made some difference it's smoother and seems to have better acceleration, the other beauty of them is you never have to replace them just wash them in soapy water dry them and reoil them, no more buying air filters.
I've yet to see an aftermarket filter that makes a positive improvement, as the std one is bloody massive anyway.  Most have a detrimental affect on perfromance, though the noise may make you think otherwise.  On the bigger engines, there is more to be gained (and lost), unlike the OP's 2.0l.

As you're running an oiled filter, just be careful, as the expensive MAFs don't like the oil.

Hence I stick to the std, genuine part...
your right its cheaper to buy an air filter than the maf sensor!!i,ll just leave well alone and probably get another v6 in a few months to satisfy my need for speed!! cheers mate  :y :y
Logged

TheBoy

  • Administrator
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • Brackley, Northants
  • Posts: 106817
  • I Like Lockdown
    • Whatever Starts
    • View Profile
Re: PERFORMANCE FILTERS FOR 2.0 16V
« Reply #13 on: 02 July 2008, 20:47:03 »

Quote
Quote
Quote
I have a Pipercross free flow filter on my 3.0 ltr MV6 and it appears to have made some difference it's smoother and seems to have better acceleration, the other beauty of them is you never have to replace them just wash them in soapy water dry them and reoil them, no more buying air filters.
I've yet to see an aftermarket filter that makes a positive improvement, as the std one is bloody massive anyway.  Most have a detrimental affect on perfromance, though the noise may make you think otherwise.  On the bigger engines, there is more to be gained (and lost), unlike the OP's 2.0l.

As you're running an oiled filter, just be careful, as the expensive MAFs don't like the oil.

Hence I stick to the std, genuine part...
your right its cheaper to buy an air filter than the maf sensor!!i,ll just leave well alone and probably get another v6 in a few months to satisfy my need for speed!! cheers mate  :y :y
Not a huge amount to be done on 2.0l performance wise without spending a bucketload...  ...breather and throttle body cleaner is one freebie worth doing, as well as lots of lovely oil changes
Logged
Grumpy old man
Pages: [1]   Go Up
 

Page created in 0.014 seconds with 17 queries.