Omega Owners Forum

Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  

News:

Please check the Forum Guidelines at the top of the Newbie section

Pages: [1] 2  All   Go Down

Author Topic: omega 2.0i  (Read 2642 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

jimmas

  • Senior Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • stevenage, herts
  • Posts: 516
    • View Profile
omega 2.0i
« on: 13 August 2008, 20:44:37 »

guys I may be changing my 2.2i cdx for a slightly newer 2.0i cd, the reason being mine has got a few miles on it now, still not sure weather to change or not, but my question is will I notice much loss of power, and will my fuel consumption be better or worse.
Logged

TheBoy

  • Administrator
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • Brackley, Northants
  • Posts: 107027
  • I Like Lockdown
    • Whatever Starts
    • View Profile
Re: omega 2.0i
« Reply #1 on: 13 August 2008, 20:56:43 »

Any 2.0 Omega will be older than your 2.2  :-/
Logged
Grumpy old man

jimmas

  • Senior Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • stevenage, herts
  • Posts: 516
    • View Profile
Re: omega 2.0i
« Reply #2 on: 13 August 2008, 21:01:43 »

mine currently is a 2000plate on w, the one I am looking at is 2000plate on an x, it's mainly for the milage drop that I am considering.
Logged

TheBoy

  • Administrator
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • Brackley, Northants
  • Posts: 107027
  • I Like Lockdown
    • Whatever Starts
    • View Profile
Re: omega 2.0i
« Reply #3 on: 13 August 2008, 21:09:27 »

Quote
mine currently is a 2000plate on w, the one I am looking at is 2000plate on an x, it's mainly for the milage drop that I am considering.
If yours is a 2.2, its not a 2000 model ;)

ime, the 2.2 seems noticibly torqier, and doesn't feel as 'stretched' as a 2.0
Logged
Grumpy old man

jimmas

  • Senior Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • stevenage, herts
  • Posts: 516
    • View Profile
Re: omega 2.0i
« Reply #4 on: 13 August 2008, 21:13:04 »

Hi jamie, what would mine be it's on a w plate, it's baged as a 2.2i and the log book shows 2.2i year 2000, it can't be any newer than a 2000plate. also forgot it is an opel not vauxhall omega.
« Last Edit: 13 August 2008, 21:14:19 by jimmas »
Logged

TheBoy

  • Administrator
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • Brackley, Northants
  • Posts: 107027
  • I Like Lockdown
    • Whatever Starts
    • View Profile
Re: omega 2.0i
« Reply #5 on: 13 August 2008, 21:17:10 »

Quote
Hi jamie, what would mine be it's on a w plate, it's baged as a 2.2i and the log book shows 2.2i year 2000, it can't be any newer than a 2000plate. also forgot it is an opel not vauxhall omega.
Check VIN, what is number following the 69 (or 35) in middle of VIN?
Logged
Grumpy old man

jimmas

  • Senior Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • stevenage, herts
  • Posts: 516
    • View Profile
Re: omega 2.0i
« Reply #6 on: 13 August 2008, 21:20:58 »

shows as Y11xxxxx REG DATE 23-05-2000
« Last Edit: 13 August 2008, 21:22:39 by TheBoy »
Logged

TheBoy

  • Administrator
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • Brackley, Northants
  • Posts: 107027
  • I Like Lockdown
    • Whatever Starts
    • View Profile
Re: omega 2.0i
« Reply #7 on: 13 August 2008, 21:23:45 »

Quote
shows as Y11xxxxx REG DATE 23-05-2000
Yup, thats a 2000MY.  Wonder if Opel fitted 2.2 earlier, iirc it came in with 2001MY (so midway through 2000)

**Edit - I'm talking rubbish, its the v6 dbw engines that came in at 2001, 2.2 came in in 2000  :-[
« Last Edit: 13 August 2008, 21:24:32 by TheBoy »
Logged
Grumpy old man

jimmas

  • Senior Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • stevenage, herts
  • Posts: 516
    • View Profile
Re: omega 2.0i
« Reply #8 on: 13 August 2008, 21:27:43 »

cheers jamie I was starting to panic, somthing was wrong, is the 20i better on fuel than my 2.2i or about the same.
Logged

Proz

  • Omega Baron
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • Largoward , Fife , Scotland
  • Posts: 2647
    • Omega-less now :-/
    • View Profile
Re: omega 2.0i
« Reply #9 on: 13 August 2008, 21:32:24 »

Quote
cheers jamie I was starting to panic, somthing was wrong, is the 20i better on fuel than my 2.2i or about the same.

Ive recently changed from a 1997 2.0ltr GLS to a 2002 2.2 CD and would say the 2.2 is a bit faster but fuel wise i havent noticed much of a difference to be honest .... suppose that depends on how you drive it though  ;)
« Last Edit: 13 August 2008, 21:33:01 by Mark38 »
Logged
Get yourself Giff Gaff'ed here :-) ...  http://giffgaff.com/orders/affiliate/proz

TheBoy

  • Administrator
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • Brackley, Northants
  • Posts: 107027
  • I Like Lockdown
    • Whatever Starts
    • View Profile
Re: omega 2.0i
« Reply #10 on: 13 August 2008, 21:35:41 »

Quote
cheers jamie I was starting to panic, somthing was wrong, is the 20i better on fuel than my 2.2i or about the same.
same.
Logged
Grumpy old man

jimmas

  • Senior Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • stevenage, herts
  • Posts: 516
    • View Profile
Re: omega 2.0i
« Reply #11 on: 13 August 2008, 21:58:29 »

cheers for reply's guys will base decision on mileage differance alone.
Logged

TheBoy

  • Administrator
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • Brackley, Northants
  • Posts: 107027
  • I Like Lockdown
    • Whatever Starts
    • View Profile
Re: omega 2.0i
« Reply #12 on: 13 August 2008, 22:01:01 »

Whatever, the 2.0 will be older, though only by months...
Logged
Grumpy old man

Martin_1962

  • Guest
Re: omega 2.0i
« Reply #13 on: 14 August 2008, 15:01:49 »

How much cheaper is the 2.0?  I'd stay with the newer but higher mileage car
Logged

jimmas

  • Senior Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • stevenage, herts
  • Posts: 516
    • View Profile
Re: omega 2.0i
« Reply #14 on: 14 August 2008, 21:36:33 »

hi the 2.0 is newer than my 2.2i by about 6months, mine is 2000 on w plate the one i'm considering is a 2000 on a x plate. and about 35000 miles less than mine.
Logged
Pages: [1] 2  All   Go Up
 

Page created in 0.009 seconds with 16 queries.