Omega Owners Forum

Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  

News:

Please check the Forum Guidelines at the top of the Newbie section

Pages: 1 [2] 3  All   Go Down

Author Topic: 4 or 6 Cylinder ?  (Read 2753 times)

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

JohnM

  • Intermediate Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • Newark on Trent
  • Posts: 319
    • 2.5M Estate
    • View Profile
Re: 4 or 6 Cylinder ?
« Reply #15 on: 27 September 2010, 21:58:34 »

v6.

- Tony, that does quite extrapolate, perhaps I need to drive faster.  Every time I drive mine the ave mpg goes up a bit - indeed on the last little trip the range went *up* over the first 20 miles.  However, driving at 60-70 doesn't get me to 60mpg - Ah, its a slushbox I knew there was a reason!
Logged

albitz

  • Guest
Re: 4 or 6 Cylinder ?
« Reply #16 on: 27 September 2010, 22:00:58 »

Cant read a lot of your post because your avatar is blocking it. ;)
Logged

Tony H

  • Omega Baron
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • liverpool
  • Posts: 4940
  • Black Elites are luurvley
    • View Profile
Re: 4 or 6 Cylinder ?
« Reply #17 on: 27 September 2010, 22:18:13 »

Quote
Overall economy really dedends on what sort of driving your neigbour does. If he does alot of motorway miles driven carfully I have returned mid thirties mpg, on the other hand town driving really nails fuel comsumption. I have noticed a corrollation between average speed and fuel use they seem to work out the same, e.g. 18 mph = 18 mpg 21 mph = 21 mpg.
[/highlight] Some people have obviously misunderstood  this post the link between mpg and mph  only applies to town driving :-? wouldn't it be good if you got 60 mpg at 60 mph :)
« Last Edit: 27 September 2010, 22:19:34 by Tony_H »
Logged
Be aware of mole holes be very aware!

unclelicklug

  • Intermediate Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • Sheffield
  • Posts: 255
    • View Profile
Re: 4 or 6 Cylinder ?
« Reply #18 on: 27 September 2010, 23:30:49 »

FWIW if you want economy buy a 4 cyl diesel, you may or may not feel this suits the car - and I definitely see the attraction of a V6 Omega for wafting along but I bought my 2.2 DTi estate for the combination of space and relative economy, and so far not been disappointed.
Right now I'm showing 40.4 to 40.5 mpg on the t/c which I'm sure is not strictly accurate (I have checked and wasn't too far off) but I can definitely live with this given the space / comfort / equipment even in a lowly CD.
Not checked recently but I dare sat there is a premium for diesel - but you'll get that back on resale and enjoy fuel savings in the meantime if you can live with manual - and not the quickest journey times.
Logged

Vamps

  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • Bishop Middleham, Co Durham.
  • Posts: 24708
  • Flying Tonight, so Be Prepared.
    • Mig 2.6CDX and 2.2 Honda
    • View Profile
Re: 4 or 6 Cylinder ?
« Reply #19 on: 28 September 2010, 00:13:52 »

Quote
My missus's 2.0 (manual gearbox) gets close to 30mpg average, and mostly only does short urban/suburban journeys.

Driven gently, it's not too bad for its mass. 
Probably not the engine of choice for anyone who has something to prove on the road though.

As for maintenance, I'm very glad she doesn't have a V6; so many jobs that are pretty easy on the 4-pot sound balls-achey on the Vs:)


That tends to be my line of thinking, I do not need to drive at high speed and the 4 pot is much simpler to work on, how many horror stories do we hear on here with the V6 :D If I wanted a fast car, the Omega would not be on the list.... :D :D
Logged

seanjones

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Sussex coast, near brighton
  • Posts: 11
    • View Profile
Re: 4 or 6 Cylinder ?
« Reply #20 on: 28 September 2010, 12:31:22 »

My 2.2 petrol auto has awful economy round town, 22-23 mpg. But the handling is so nice I can't get rid of it.
Logged
2002 16v Sport Auto

duggs

  • Omega Knight
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • Felixstowe
  • Posts: 1212
    • BMW 3.0 Sport
    • View Profile
Re: 4 or 6 Cylinder ?
« Reply #21 on: 29 September 2010, 14:26:29 »

Well, long term I would have thought it would be better to have a big engine to push such weight along.

Logically a 2.0 or 2.2 is having to work alot harder, wearing out "bits" quicker to do the same thing.

BUT hey...I ain't no expert or mechanic.
Logged

Del Boy

  • Omega Queen
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • Kent, UK.
  • Posts: 10804
    • 2012 '62' BMW 730d MSport
    • View Profile
Re: 4 or 6 Cylinder ?
« Reply #22 on: 29 September 2010, 14:38:02 »

Get a 2.6 manual. Best of both worlds then.
Logged
Drives: 2013 (13) BMW 530d M Sport Touring, 2011 '61' BMW 520d SE.

Lizzie_Zoom

  • Guest
Re: 4 or 6 Cylinder ?
« Reply #23 on: 29 September 2010, 14:38:58 »

I would always recommend going for the V6 if you enjoy powerful driving and do not mind the running costs too much!!
Logged

Pitchfork

  • Omega Baron
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • Tadley (near Basingrad)
  • Posts: 2498
  • Barndances & Morris
    • View Profile
Re: 4 or 6 Cylinder ?
« Reply #24 on: 29 September 2010, 16:49:53 »

Six cylinders in a line is the way to go (Traktors rule) :D
Logged
Almost famous!   www.pitchforkband.co.uk Guitar & PA Amps repaired & serviced
Ears pierced while you wait. PAT & Valve testing

cem_devecioglu

  • Guest
Re: 4 or 6 Cylinder ?
« Reply #25 on: 29 September 2010, 17:47:50 »

any car with the weight over 1.6 tons in city traffic wont be economical regardless of your driving style..

if you are talking about a weight of 900 kg and 1.6 litre 4 pot , that may have some chance ;D
until you hammer it ;D :P

I've tried with miggy the slowest style and all I can reach was approx 10litre/100 km (home to office)

if I try the same with clit I can get 5.7litre/100 km in the same route.. :-/
« Last Edit: 29 September 2010, 17:51:48 by cem_devecioglu »
Logged

Tony H

  • Omega Baron
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • liverpool
  • Posts: 4940
  • Black Elites are luurvley
    • View Profile
Re: 4 or 6 Cylinder ?
« Reply #26 on: 29 September 2010, 19:25:48 »

Quote
any car with the weight over 1.6 tons in city traffic wont be economical regardless of your driving style..

if you are talking about a weight of 900 kg and 1.6 litre 4 pot , that may have some chance ;D
until you hammer it ;D :P

I've tried with miggy the slowest style and all I can reach was approx 10litre/100 km (home to office)

if I try the same with clit I can get 5.7litre/100 km in the same route.. :-/
Speak English Cem ;)
Logged
Be aware of mole holes be very aware!

cem_devecioglu

  • Guest
Re: 4 or 6 Cylinder ?
« Reply #27 on: 29 September 2010, 19:33:55 »

Quote
Quote
any car with the weight over 1.6 tons in city traffic wont be economical regardless of your driving style..

if you are talking about a weight of 900 kg and 1.6 litre 4 pot , that may have some chance ;D
until you hammer it ;D :P

I've tried with miggy the slowest style and all I can reach was approx 10litre/100 km (home to office)

if I try the same with clit I can get 5.7litre/100 km in the same route.. :-/
Speak English Cem ;)

what you are not using litre ;D ;D :y

here you go
10 lt/100 km =28 mpg
5.7lt/100 km =50 mpg
« Last Edit: 29 September 2010, 19:36:03 by cem_devecioglu »
Logged

Entwood

  • Omega Queen
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • North Wiltshire
  • Posts: 19566
  • My Old 3.2 V6 Elite (LPG)
    • Audi A6 Allroad 3.0 DTI
    • View Profile
Re: 4 or 6 Cylinder ?
« Reply #28 on: 29 September 2010, 19:50:38 »

6 cylinders and 2 pedals  :y :y :y :y :y :y :y :y :y

 ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D
Logged

Marks DTM Calib

  • Administrator
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • West Bridgford
  • Posts: 33983
  • Git!
    • View Profile
Re: 4 or 6 Cylinder ?
« Reply #29 on: 29 September 2010, 19:53:50 »

Get a V6 and disconnect 2 injectors
Logged
Pages: 1 [2] 3  All   Go Up
 

Page created in 0.018 seconds with 18 queries.