Print

Please login or register.
1 Hour 1 Day 1 Week 1 Month Forever
Login with username, password and session length

[humbucker]

they probably are, but are spark plugs the same across the v6 range i.e. 3.0/3.2 etc? p/n 9195868?

[serek]

2.5 and 3.0 are different to 3.2 and 2.6

humbucker I put bid on caravan meybe will bring with me to Billing 8-)

[i260]

For what it's worth, I took out gen GM spec on my 2.6 which were double electrode and bought new GM ones from a deeler and they were 4 electrode!

Subtly different code on the sides, can't remember what that was though.

[humbucker]

is the 3.2 part no 9195868? the four electrode version of the plug?

nice to hear you're getting a caravan hehehe TheBoy will be pleased. 

putting a caravan on the back of your omega adds 20bhp you know. fact. 

[Marks DTM Calib]

Twins will work fine in any of the V6's, the quads only give a theoreticaly longer service interval.

[humbucker]

Twins will work fine in any of the V6's, the quads only give a theoreticaly longer service interval.

ah so no actual difference in the performance of the plug, just capable of more wear and tear? and is 9195868 the quad version?

[Marks DTM Calib]

Yes, it is, the twin electrode ones are 93183992 (note the 3.0 has different ones listed at much higher cost, but the above will work fine).

Beware though, the quads often come loose long before they need changing.

[humbucker]

so 9195109 is the 3.0 plug? but this can't be used in the 3.2?