Omega Owners Forum

Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  

News:

Welcome to OOF

Pages: [1] 2  All   Go Down

Author Topic: omega 2.5 diesel verses 2.2 diesel  (Read 2800 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

mosty3

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • stockport
  • Posts: 2
    • 406
    • View Profile
omega 2.5 diesel verses 2.2 diesel
« on: 18 January 2012, 08:33:31 »

hi every one , after info on omega estate , the 2.5 d is rear wheel drive but is the 2.2 d rear or front, going to be towing a twin axle caravan so i need rear wheel drive and the weight and bhp, the 2.5 is 140 and the 2.2 is 120, not alot in it or is there. any advice chaps. many thanks. mosty3
Logged

twiglet

  • Omega Baron
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • Norwich, Norfolk
  • Posts: 2171
  • 2008 BMW E61 535D LCi M Sport
    • View Profile
Re: omega 2.5 diesel verses 2.2 diesel
« Reply #1 on: 18 January 2012, 08:41:52 »

All Omegas are rear wheel drive.

The 2.5 is a de-tuned BMW 6-cylinder diesel.  When fitted in a BMW 525tds it produces 170bhp, and this can be achieved in an Omega by chipping the ECU (details on this forum)
The 2.2 is a 4 cylinder Gm engine, and as you say, produces 125bhp.

The 2.5 was fitted to Omegas from 1994 to 2001, it was then replaced by the 2.2 until the end of Omega production.

Personally I would say you'd be better off with the 2.5 if you're towing a heavy caravan, but the choice is yours.  :y
Logged
It doesn't matter how far you push the envelope, it will always be stationery...

mosty3

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • stockport
  • Posts: 2
    • 406
    • View Profile
Re: omega 2.5 diesel verses 2.2 diesel
« Reply #2 on: 18 January 2012, 08:48:07 »

many thanks for the info. cheers mosty3
Logged

Andy B

  • Get A Life!!
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • Bury Lancs
  • Posts: 39734
    • ML350 TDM SmartRoadster
    • View Profile
Re: omega 2.5 diesel verses 2.2 diesel
« Reply #3 on: 18 January 2012, 11:35:23 »

many thanks for the info. cheers mosty3

Also, 2.5 6 cylinder is available with an auto box, the 2.2 is only available with a third pedal and having towed miles with my auto wouldn't want the hassle of a clutch when towing.  :y :y

But that's up to you.  :y
Logged

unclelicklug

  • Intermediate Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • Sheffield
  • Posts: 255
    • View Profile
Re: omega 2.5 diesel verses 2.2 diesel
« Reply #4 on: 18 January 2012, 12:42:02 »

I like my 2.2 but for towing a heavy van I suspect the 2.5 is the better option.
As stated 2.2 was never offered with auto (AFAIK), I often wondered if this is because the engine is already marginal for the car without losing horses to an auto?

Reports on OOF suggest the 2.5 auto is not all that economical - but doubtless will be nicer for towing.
Logged

maracus

  • Intermediate Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • Cambs
  • Posts: 426
  • Hahaha cool- 1000+bhp combined on the drive!!!!!!!
    • 3.0mv6 auto, cav4x4 turbo
    • View Profile
Re: omega 2.5 diesel verses 2.2 diesel
« Reply #5 on: 18 January 2012, 15:02:38 »

IMHO??? BMW lump 2.5 all day long :)
Logged
The weather is here... Wish you were beautiful!

Marks DTM Calib

  • Administrator
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • West Bridgford
  • Posts: 33984
  • Git!
    • View Profile
Re: omega 2.5 diesel verses 2.2 diesel
« Reply #6 on: 18 January 2012, 15:29:27 »

IMHO??? BMW lump 2.5 all day long :)

Lol, although the 2.2 certainly seems to be a bit more reliable.
Logged

deviator

  • Omega Knight
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Chesterfield
  • Posts: 1398
    • View Profile
Re: omega 2.5 diesel verses 2.2 diesel
« Reply #7 on: 18 January 2012, 15:52:06 »

I'd opt for the 2.5 for smoothness and torque. Both of which are important when towing.
Logged
FCR and cam lock off kit available. Deposit maybe required. Contact me.

zirk

  • Omega Queen
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • Epping Forest
  • Posts: 11436
  • 3.2 Manual Special Saloon ReMapped and LPG'd and
    • 3.2 Manual Special Estate
    • View Profile
Re: omega 2.5 diesel verses 2.2 diesel
« Reply #8 on: 18 January 2012, 15:57:52 »

Although the 2.5TD are old hats now, my choice would be 2.5 with manual.
Logged

Michael2.6

  • Intermediate Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • Bishop Auckland
  • Posts: 410
    • Vauxhall Omega
    • View Profile
Re: omega 2.5 diesel verses 2.2 diesel
« Reply #9 on: 18 January 2012, 19:11:47 »

Twiglet I was thinking the 2.5 v6 petrol has 170 bhp not the 2.5 td diesel

2.5 diesel has 133 bhp the 2.2 dti has 120 bhp

I think.
Logged

hoofing it

  • Omega Knight
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • Posts: 1556
    • View Profile
Re: omega 2.5 diesel verses 2.2 diesel
« Reply #10 on: 18 January 2012, 19:30:39 »

Twiglet I was thinking the 2.5 v6 petrol has 170 bhp not the 2.5 td diesel

2.5 diesel has 133 bhp the 2.2 dti has 120 bhp

I think.
He was trying to say that you could get 170bhp if you chipped a 2.5td.
As others have said get a 2.5td manual and chip it :y
Logged

kcl

  • Omega Knight
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • Finland
  • Posts: 1224
    • Volvo V60 D4 -14
    • View Profile
Re: omega 2.5 diesel verses 2.2 diesel
« Reply #11 on: 19 January 2012, 13:01:42 »

many thanks for the info. cheers mosty3

Also, 2.5 6 cylinder is available with an auto box, the 2.2 is only available with a third pedal and having towed miles with my auto wouldn't want the hassle of a clutch when towing.  :y :y

But that's up to you.  :y

That's funny, we have plenty of 2,2 with auto box... and if I'm not completely wrong it's the AR25 box so should be doable to change manual to auto  :-\
Logged

twiglet

  • Omega Baron
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • Norwich, Norfolk
  • Posts: 2171
  • 2008 BMW E61 535D LCi M Sport
    • View Profile
Re: omega 2.5 diesel verses 2.2 diesel
« Reply #12 on: 19 January 2012, 13:40:23 »

many thanks for the info. cheers mosty3

Also, 2.5 6 cylinder is available with an auto box, the 2.2 is only available with a third pedal and having towed miles with my auto wouldn't want the hassle of a clutch when towing.  :y :y

But that's up to you.  :y

That's funny, we have plenty of 2,2 with auto box... and if I'm not completely wrong it's the AR25 box so should be doable to change manual to auto  :-\

Petrol or diesel?  ???
Logged
It doesn't matter how far you push the envelope, it will always be stationery...

kcl

  • Omega Knight
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • Finland
  • Posts: 1224
    • Volvo V60 D4 -14
    • View Profile
Re: omega 2.5 diesel verses 2.2 diesel
« Reply #13 on: 16 March 2012, 06:29:35 »

Sorry, my bad... gasoline ones. No 2,2 disiesals AFAIK here, only 2,5 ones
Logged

tunnie

  • Get A Life!!
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • Surrey
  • Posts: 37547
    • Zafira Tourer & BMW 435i
    • View Profile
Re: omega 2.5 diesel verses 2.2 diesel
« Reply #14 on: 16 March 2012, 08:01:55 »

2.5 diesel can be chipped to 170 bhp in full BMW spec, manual is best for this. If you chip an auto the gearbox will have to be upgraded to the AR35 fitted to 3.0 & 3.2s as the standard box won't handle the torque. :)
Logged
Pages: [1] 2  All   Go Up
 

Page created in 0.021 seconds with 16 queries.