On the point of having conviction over one's statements I can see and sympathise with your point A.
There is a basic difficulty however in that when the treaty is ratified in its entirety the conditions are subsumed into European law.
Any one wishing to do something about it - including the Tories under DC - would find it all but impossible to achieve any satisfactory result short of withdrawing from the main framework of the EU.
This would prove very difficult and may result in a legal, practical and political problem of such proportion and complexity that the interests of this country could be placed in jeopardy for some time from that point.
It seems that we have been 'done up like a kipper' by the Brown regime and Brussels.
I would have thought however that DC should have considered the possibility of this happening as it has - and if he didn't, one would have to question his judgement or the efficacy of the advice he was given and his ability to assess it.
The treaty is self-amending, in that it is now all but impossible to renegotiate any of its existing parts or any parts yet to come.
I would agree with Albs that the only way is to leave the EU. Sounds bizarre, I know, but until we do even that miniscule portion of our democracy that we still have will be eaten up by the superstate.
Even though this country may suffer financially (although I don't think we will), it is not all about money. Our previous generations fought over the freedom of people to determine our future thorugh our parliament. This Treaty is a backward step for democracy, not just for us, but for all the peoples of the Europe.
It is entirely illogical - and hypocritical - to devolve government to Scotland, Wales and (hesitatingly) Northern Ireland on the basis that this enhances democracy, yet surrender the power of the Westminster to the EU.
Thank you, Blair and Brown for selling our sovereignty for your own political advancement.
I'm off to UKIP.
