Omega Owners Forum

Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  

News:

Welcome to OOF

Pages: 1 2 [3]  All   Go Down

Author Topic: Ferrari disgrace  (Read 3422 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

2woody

  • Omega Baron
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Northumberland
  • Posts: 2374
    • View Profile
Re: Ferrari disgrace
« Reply #30 on: 26 July 2010, 14:14:04 »

what's wrong with team orders.

people easily forget that F1 is a contest between teams, not just drivers. It's for the team to take whatever action they see fit in order to get a most favourable result. If this favours one driver over another, then so be it.
Logged

Chris_H

  • Omega Knight
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • E London/Essex UK
  • Posts: 1716
    • Jag XF Portfolio S 3.0D
    • View Profile
Re: Ferrari disgrace
« Reply #31 on: 26 July 2010, 14:19:41 »

Quote
what's wrong with team orders.

people easily forget that F1 is a contest between teams, not just drivers. It's for the team to take whatever action they see fit in order to get a most favourable result. If this favours one driver over another, then so be it.
You've rather missed the point that the FIA specifically banned it.  Your view is shared by many though, DC for one.
Logged
First Vauxhall - PABX Cresta; Previous, previous Vauxhall - 3.0 12v Senator CD; Previous Vauxhall Omega Elite 3.0V6 Saloon Auto

2woody

  • Omega Baron
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Northumberland
  • Posts: 2374
    • View Profile
Re: Ferrari disgrace
« Reply #32 on: 26 July 2010, 14:26:36 »

Quote
You've rather missed the point that the FIA specifically banned it.  Your view is shared by many though, DC for one.

rather too worried by negative press, methinks
Logged

TheBoy

  • Administrator
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • Brackley, Northants
  • Posts: 107038
  • I Like Lockdown
    • Whatever Starts
    • View Profile
Re: Ferrari disgrace
« Reply #33 on: 26 July 2010, 15:18:17 »

I think a team should be able to play itself as it sees fit, seeing as it is 'a team'.

But, FIA made those rules (rightly or wrongly), so they should have to abiode by them.
Logged
Grumpy old man

Terbs

  • Omega Lord
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Brackley/Wareham
  • Posts: 5714
  • The Freezer Geezer
    • CD Saloon 2003
    • View Profile
Re: Ferrari disgrace
« Reply #34 on: 26 July 2010, 19:38:49 »

Agree with TB on abiding by rules they made.

However....if they do revert back to 'team orders', then they should scrap the individual drivers championship.
In any other sport its called 'nobbling', and those found out are usualy thrown out !!!!!!!!! And where money is involved, its usually a visit to court.
Looking at it in another way...do people bet on who will win the race............do they get their money back. I think not !!!! Therefore its 'nobbling'
Logged
Wrong Switch Tony......flicking the wrong bit for 50 years

Amigo

  • Omega Baron
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • Immingham N.E Lincs.
  • Posts: 4116
  • Be objective, be selective.
    • Passat & Cortina GXL
    • View Profile
Re: Ferrari disgrace
« Reply #35 on: 26 July 2010, 19:49:57 »

It does seem a tad cheeky but hardly surprising just glad i did'nt sit through it.
   Not knocking F1 fans, i used to love it myself but over the last few seasons it's become bitchier than a soap opera. I remember the 70's when motorsport was about driving...
   ....Yardley Mclaren soap on a rope!!!! :D 8-) :y
Logged
Curry makes the world go round!

2woody

  • Omega Baron
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Northumberland
  • Posts: 2374
    • View Profile
Re: Ferrari disgrace
« Reply #36 on: 27 July 2010, 09:07:28 »

all that's not really true - just look a football - the manager has free reign to do what he wants with the team. He can even substitute one player for another.

it's the team that matters
Logged

Chris_H

  • Omega Knight
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • E London/Essex UK
  • Posts: 1716
    • Jag XF Portfolio S 3.0D
    • View Profile
Re: Ferrari disgrace
« Reply #37 on: 27 July 2010, 10:04:16 »

Quote
all that's not really true - just look a football - the manager has free reign to do what he wants with the team. He can even substitute one player for another.

it's the team that matters
I don't think the comparison with football comes close.

If you were to give large bonuses to individual football players or man of the match, you might have something akin to the conflict that team and driver championships create in F1.
Logged
First Vauxhall - PABX Cresta; Previous, previous Vauxhall - 3.0 12v Senator CD; Previous Vauxhall Omega Elite 3.0V6 Saloon Auto

Kevin Wood

  • Global Moderator
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • Alton, Hampshire
  • Posts: 36417
    • Jaguar XE 25t, Westfield
    • View Profile
Re: Ferrari disgrace
« Reply #38 on: 27 July 2010, 11:33:42 »

The issue is that team playing just doesn't work in Motorsport, IMHO.

As soon as it's no longer each driver to his own in a race to the chequered flag, much of the excitement has gone, IMHO.

I don't know what the solution is, as clearly F1 cars have to be operated by teams due to the costs involved.

Maybe there should be a driver's championship but no constructors' championship, or vice versa?

Maybe there should be no comms between driver and team during the race?

I don't recall team orders spoiling things as badly in the golden era of F1 (when I bothered to watch it). Why not?

Maybe teams should have to field a "rookie" and a more experienced driver rather than two more evenly matched drivers?

Kevin
Logged
Tech2 services currently available. See TheBoy's price list: http://theboy.omegaowners.com/

Pitchfork

  • Omega Baron
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • Tadley (near Basingrad)
  • Posts: 2498
  • Barndances & Morris
    • View Profile
Re: Ferrari disgrace
« Reply #39 on: 27 July 2010, 13:06:37 »

Quote
The issue is that team playing just doesn't work in Motorsport, IMHO.

As soon as it's no longer each driver to his own in a race to the chequered flag, much of the excitement has gone, IMHO.

I don't know what the solution is, as clearly F1 cars have to be operated by teams due to the costs involved.

Maybe there should be a driver's championship but no constructors' championship, or vice versa?

Maybe there should be no comms between driver and team during the race?

I don't recall team orders spoiling things as badly in the golden era of F1 (when I bothered to watch it). Why not?

Maybe teams should have to field a "rookie" and a more experienced driver rather than two more evenly matched drivers?

Kevin
...........or just one driver per Team?
Logged
Almost famous!   www.pitchforkband.co.uk Guitar & PA Amps repaired & serviced
Ears pierced while you wait. PAT & Valve testing

2woody

  • Omega Baron
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Northumberland
  • Posts: 2374
    • View Profile
Re: Ferrari disgrace
« Reply #40 on: 27 July 2010, 14:02:07 »

team orders was very prevalent throughout the seventies and eighties.

before that, in the sixties, team managers would call in a no2 driver and give his car to a number 1 if his own had failed.
Logged

jerry

  • Omega Knight
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • 0
  • Posts: 1314
    • View Profile
Re: Ferrari disgrace
« Reply #41 on: 27 July 2010, 14:11:36 »

oh for the days of graham hill and jackie stewart.....  :-/
Logged

zirax

  • Intermediate Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • 0
  • Posts: 256
    • View Profile
Re: Ferrari disgrace
« Reply #42 on: 28 July 2010, 08:57:08 »

This was the icing on the cake for what was a truly horrific race. Webber was told to slow down on lap 30. By lap 37 the McLaren's were told to slow down. Then the team orders came through..... I went outside and washed the car.

If Alonso was sooo quick, how come he wasn't quick enough to overtake Massa? Yes dirty air etc etc but come on, at least try and earn your win.
Logged
Dr Richard Stephens:- "I would advise people, if they hurt themselves, to swear."
Pages: 1 2 [3]  All   Go Up
 

Page created in 0.019 seconds with 17 queries.