Omega Owners Forum

Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  

News:

Please check the Forum Guidelines at the top of the Newbie section

Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5  All   Go Down

Author Topic: At war again by the weekend ?  (Read 4127 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Banjax

  • Omega Lord
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • Perth
  • Posts: 5510
  • We're just a virus with shoes
    • View Profile
Re: At war again by the weekend ?
« Reply #45 on: 19 March 2011, 08:52:57 »
Quote
Quote
Quote
If we dont have the planes and carriers (no bad thing) then we cant get heavily involved (no bad thing) this means less expense (no bad thing).

Its just win, win, win  ;D ;D ;D



But we do have enough Tornado GR4's, Typhoons, and even Nimrod's,  R1's that is, are available.  We don't need the carriers as thanks to our old Empire we can still use Gibraltar, Malta and Cyprus :y :y :y

But of course it will also be the French, Italians, and whatever the Arab League nations are prepared to use, involved, not just British resources!

Well done by the way to David Cameron for playing this policy all the way through, against initial great (USA) opposition, to arrive at this historic UN commitment! :y :y :y :y :y


No one wanted to comment on my post then!! ::) ::) ::)

Oh, well!! >:( >:(

maybe everyone agrees and theres nothing more to say?

and if you believe that you'll believe the Libyan ceasefire exists  :o :y
Logged
50 bucks!?! For 50 bucks I'd put my face in their soup and blow!!

Mysteryman

  • Guest
Re: At war again by the weekend ?
« Reply #46 on: 19 March 2011, 10:17:09 »
Quote
Quote
Quote
If we dont have the planes and carriers (no bad thing) then we cant get heavily involved (no bad thing) this means less expense (no bad thing).

Its just win, win, win  ;D ;D ;D



But we do have enough Tornado GR4's, Typhoons, and even Nimrod's,  R1's that is, are available.  We don't need the carriers as thanks to our old Empire we can still use Gibraltar, Malta and Cyprus :y :y :y

But of course it will also be the French, Italians, and whatever the Arab League nations are prepared to use, involved, not just British resources!

Well done by the way to David Cameron for playing this policy all the way through, against initial great (USA) opposition, to arrive at this historic UN commitment! :y :y :y :y :y


No one wanted to comment on my post then!! ::) ::) ::)

Oh, well!! >:( >:(


Oh dear. A female type hissy fit. Good job we don't have a woman PM(T).
Logged

feeutfo

  • Guest
Re: At war again by the weekend ?
« Reply #47 on: 19 March 2011, 11:09:33 »
Pilot left it late to eject didn't he? Suspect ejecting early may be unwise, but didn't see the shoot open.  :o

Logged

Lizzie_Zoom

  • Guest
Re: At war again by the weekend ?
« Reply #48 on: 19 March 2011, 12:14:02 »
Quote
Quote
Quote
Quote
If we dont have the planes and carriers (no bad thing) then we cant get heavily involved (no bad thing) this means less expense (no bad thing).

Its just win, win, win  ;D ;D ;D



But we do have enough Tornado GR4's, Typhoons, and even Nimrod's,  R1's that is, are available.  We don't need the carriers as thanks to our old Empire we can still use Gibraltar, Malta and Cyprus :y :y :y

But of course it will also be the French, Italians, and whatever the Arab League nations are prepared to use, involved, not just British resources!

Well done by the way to David Cameron for playing this policy all the way through, against initial great (USA) opposition, to arrive at this historic UN commitment! :y :y :y :y :y


No one wanted to comment on my post then!! ::) ::) ::)

Oh, well!! >:( >:(


Oh dear. A female type hissy fit. Good job we don't have a woman PM(T).


Cannot argue that Steve, and I am sorry everyone!! :-[ :-[ :-[  Got up this morning feeling crap, and had to take it out on somebody!  So opened up on the OOF, and fired where I could!! :P :P :P :P 

Feel better now!! :D :D :D :D ;)  Sorry again :-X :-X :-X
Logged

cem_devecioglu

  • Guest
Re: At war again by the weekend ?
« Reply #49 on: 19 March 2011, 14:44:32 »
Quote
Quote
Quote
Quote
Quote
If we dont have the planes and carriers (no bad thing) then we cant get heavily involved (no bad thing) this means less expense (no bad thing).

Its just win, win, win  ;D ;D ;D



But we do have enough Tornado GR4's, Typhoons, and even Nimrod's,  R1's that is, are available.  We don't need the carriers as thanks to our old Empire we can still use Gibraltar, Malta and Cyprus :y :y :y

But of course it will also be the French, Italians, and whatever the Arab League nations are prepared to use, involved, not just British resources!

Well done by the way to David Cameron for playing this policy all the way through, against initial great (USA) opposition, to arrive at this historic UN commitment! :y :y :y :y :y


No one wanted to comment on my post then!! ::) ::) ::)

Oh, well!! >:( >:(


Oh dear. A female type hissy fit. Good job we don't have a woman PM(T).


Cannot argue that Steve, and I am sorry everyone!! :-[ :-[ :-[  Got up this morning feeling crap, and had to take it out on somebody!  So opened up on the OOF, and fired where I could!! :P :P :P :P 

Feel better now!! :D :D :D :D ;)  Sorry again :-X :-X :-X

 ;D ;D I wish I could too Lizzie :y
Logged

Lizzie_Zoom

  • Guest
Re: At war again by the weekend ?
« Reply #50 on: 19 March 2011, 14:45:47 »
Quote
Quote
Quote
Quote
Quote
Quote
If we dont have the planes and carriers (no bad thing) then we cant get heavily involved (no bad thing) this means less expense (no bad thing).

Its just win, win, win  ;D ;D ;D



But we do have enough Tornado GR4's, Typhoons, and even Nimrod's,  R1's that is, are available.  We don't need the carriers as thanks to our old Empire we can still use Gibraltar, Malta and Cyprus :y :y :y

But of course it will also be the French, Italians, and whatever the Arab League nations are prepared to use, involved, not just British resources!

Well done by the way to David Cameron for playing this policy all the way through, against initial great (USA) opposition, to arrive at this historic UN commitment! :y :y :y :y :y


No one wanted to comment on my post then!! ::) ::) ::)

Oh, well!! >:( >:(


Oh dear. A female type hissy fit. Good job we don't have a woman PM(T).


Cannot argue that Steve, and I am sorry everyone!! :-[ :-[ :-[  Got up this morning feeling crap, and had to take it out on somebody!  So opened up on the OOF, and fired where I could!! :P :P :P :P 

Feel better now!! :D :D :D :D ;)  Sorry again :-X :-X :-X

 ;D ;D I wish I could too Lizzie :y


 ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D  It certainly makes one feel better Cem! ;D ;D ;D ;) ;)
Logged

sotmh

  • Intermediate Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • london
  • Posts: 398
    • View Profile
Re: At war again by the weekend ?
« Reply #51 on: 19 March 2011, 20:04:09 »
LZ, Not needing aircraft carriers is not an option as it is a floating base allowing us to strike from out at sea.

Logged

Lizzie_Zoom

  • Guest
Re: At war again by the weekend ?
« Reply #52 on: 19 March 2011, 20:09:27 »
Quote
LZ, Not needing aircraft carriers is not an option as it is a floating base allowing us to strike from out at sea.



The French will have their carrier off the Libyan coast, with carriers of the USA also available as floating bases.

As I stated though, Cyprus, Malta, Gibralter, and even the Italian bases being made available could all be used by the RAF. ;) ;)

That is not forgetting the bases in Turkey and the Arab states involved in this enterprise.
« Last Edit: 19 March 2011, 20:11:29 by Lizzie_Zoom »
Logged

Mysteryman

  • Guest
Re: At war again by the weekend ?
« Reply #53 on: 19 March 2011, 20:26:40 »
Quote
Quote
LZ, Not needing aircraft carriers is not an option as it is a floating base allowing us to strike from out at sea.



The French will have their carrier off the Libyan coast, with carriers of the USA also available as floating bases.

As I stated though, Cyprus, Malta, Gibralter, and even the Italian bases being made available could all be used by the RAF. ;) ;)

That is not forgetting the bases in Turkey and the Arab states involved in this enterprise.


Hurray!
Logged

cem_devecioglu

  • Guest
Re: At war again by the weekend ?
« Reply #54 on: 19 March 2011, 20:30:09 »
Quote
Quote
Quote
LZ, Not needing aircraft carriers is not an option as it is a floating base allowing us to strike from out at sea.



The French will have their carrier off the Libyan coast, with carriers of the USA also available as floating bases.

As I stated though, Cyprus, Malta, Gibralter, and even the Italian bases being made available could all be used by the RAF. ;) ;)

That is not forgetting the bases in Turkey and the Arab states involved in this enterprise.


Hurray!

 ;D ;D
Logged

Lizzie_Zoom

  • Guest
Re: At war again by the weekend ?
« Reply #55 on: 19 March 2011, 20:46:07 »
Quote
Quote
Quote
LZ, Not needing aircraft carriers is not an option as it is a floating base allowing us to strike from out at sea.



The French will have their carrier off the Libyan coast, with carriers of the USA also available as floating bases.

As I stated though, Cyprus, Malta, Gibralter, and even the Italian bases being made available could all be used by the RAF. ;) ;)

That is not forgetting the bases in Turkey and the Arab states involved in this enterprise.


Hurray!


Cheeky bugger! ::) ::) ;D ;D ;D ;D

It is "could" Steve because we do not know yet which, if any, they "will" use as that is now a State Secret - according to my friend David! ;D ;D ;D ;D ;)

Logged

Martin_1962

  • Guest
Re: At war again by the weekend ?
« Reply #56 on: 20 March 2011, 10:07:21 »
Quote
Quote
Quote
Quote
If we dont have the planes and carriers (no bad thing) then we cant get heavily involved (no bad thing) this means less expense (no bad thing).

Its just win, win, win  ;D ;D ;D



But we do have enough Tornado GR4's, Typhoons, and even Nimrod's,  R1's that is, are available.  We don't need the carriers as thanks to our old Empire we can still use Gibraltar, Malta and Cyprus :y :y :y

But of course it will also be the French, Italians, and whatever the Arab League nations are prepared to use, involved, not just British resources!

Well done by the way to David Cameron for playing this policy all the way through, against initial great (USA) opposition, to arrive at this historic UN commitment! :y :y :y :y :y


No one wanted to comment on my post then!! ::) ::) ::)

Oh, well!! >:( >:(


Oh dear. A female type hissy fit. Good job we don't have a woman PM(T).


Our last woman PM was rather good I thought
Logged

Banjax

  • Omega Lord
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • Perth
  • Posts: 5510
  • We're just a virus with shoes
    • View Profile
Re: At war again by the weekend ?
« Reply #57 on: 20 March 2011, 10:19:00 »
Quote
Quote
Quote
Quote
Quote
If we dont have the planes and carriers (no bad thing) then we cant get heavily involved (no bad thing) this means less expense (no bad thing).

Its just win, win, win  ;D ;D ;D



But we do have enough Tornado GR4's, Typhoons, and even Nimrod's,  R1's that is, are available.  We don't need the carriers as thanks to our old Empire we can still use Gibraltar, Malta and Cyprus :y :y :y

But of course it will also be the French, Italians, and whatever the Arab League nations are prepared to use, involved, not just British resources!

Well done by the way to David Cameron for playing this policy all the way through, against initial great (USA) opposition, to arrive at this historic UN commitment! :y :y :y :y :y


No one wanted to comment on my post then!! ::) ::) ::)

Oh, well!! >:( >:(


Oh dear. A female type hissy fit. Good job we don't have a woman PM(T).


Our last woman PM was rather good I thought

yep, now we don't have to bother making anything in this country  :y
Logged
50 bucks!?! For 50 bucks I'd put my face in their soup and blow!!

sotmh

  • Intermediate Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • london
  • Posts: 398
    • View Profile
Re: At war again by the weekend ?
« Reply #58 on: 21 March 2011, 14:55:47 »
LZ,I understand we have  the use of these bases.  But we are dependent on those countries and by arrangement.

It would still be good to know they are available.  However, you may say I am counter  arguing by this fact that it will likely be a short operation and therefore carriers (asset) will not be required.

But why be dependent on others assets :question
« Last Edit: 21 March 2011, 14:56:19 by wot »
Logged

Lizzie_Zoom

  • Guest
Re: At war again by the weekend ?
« Reply #59 on: 21 March 2011, 16:15:31 »
Quote
LZ,I understand we have  the use of these bases.  But we are dependent on those countries and by arrangement.

It would still be good to know they are available.  However, you may say I am counter  arguing by this fact that it will likely be a short operation and therefore carriers (asset) will not be required.

But why be dependent on others assets :question


To start with using other peoples bases is cheaper! :D :D :D ;)

As for carriers, they are actually a wonderful target for the enemy to destroy, and that is why we are now in the age of long range fighters, with in flight re-fueling and missiles.

Note that it was a Vanguard class submarine that has fired off 124 Tomahawk missiles from "somewhere in the Mediterranean".  The new age where big surface ships are redundant in so many cases, and especially in a full scale war with a major military country. ;) ;)
Logged
Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5  All   Go Up
« previous next »
 

Page created in 0.015 seconds with 17 queries.