Dyson didn't invent cylone based filtration or vaccuming.....all he did was apply its use to a portable vaccum....then fitted a naff motor that has a habit of buring out and loads of complex plastic mouldings to make it fragile.........
OOH! Not to mention loads of really sharp corners in the air path designed to clog the 'king thing up and a cyclone that won't remove DIY dust so it clogs the tiny paper filter (which is a bit like a vacuum cleaner bag (shock! horror!) though not as effective)!
A mate of mine thinks he's great because it took him something like 200 different designs of cyclone to get it right but he didn't give up. Nope, he didn't. He just wasted loads of time and money re-inventing the wheel. What he should have done was to pick up an engineering textbook, turn to the cyclone chapter armed with his required flow rate and range of particle sizes..... Would have been the work of an afternoon.
Kevin
All good points but it's a little unfair to criticise Dyson for the engineering. Dyson is a designer not an engineer. He added design to a previously purley functional appliance and has made over £1 billion in the process.
Until the British government got greedy, all of his appliances were manufactured in the UK and his engineers and designers are still here.
Extract from Wikipedia:Following his success, the other major manufacturers began to market their own bagless vacuum cleaners. Dyson sued Hoover UK for patent infringement and won around $5 million in damages. His manufacturing plant moved from England to Malaysia, for economic reasons and because of difficulty acquiring land for expansion leaving 800 workers redundant. The company's headquarters and research facilities remain in Malmesbury, Wiltshire. Dyson later stated that because of the cost savings from transferring production to Malaysia he was able to invest in R&D at Malmesbury. Dyson employs more people in the UK than he did before the transfer of manufacturing to Malaysia, although some would argue that this is another British company who moved production jobs abroad to save money.In my opinion, James Dyson is just the sort of entrepreneur we should be encouraging in this country. It seems to be in our nature to knock anyone who has suceeded where others have failed. I agree that the invention of the cyclone technology wasn't his, he openly admits this and explains where he got it from, but it was his idea to use that technology in the domestic vacuum cleaner and to make the thing look good, in the opinion of the millions of people who have bought them, as well.
I say, James Dyson for King.
