Omega Owners Forum

Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  

News:

Search the maintenance guides for answers to 99.999% of Omega questions

Pages: 1 [2]  All   Go Down

Author Topic: omega 2.5 diesel verses 2.2 diesel  (Read 2803 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

VXL V6

  • Omega Lord
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • Warwickshire
  • Posts: 9870
    • 530D M Sport, Elite 3.2
    • View Profile
Re: omega 2.5 diesel verses 2.2 diesel
« Reply #15 on: 16 March 2012, 10:09:05 »

One thing everyone always misses in these conversations is the torque output of diesels......

We tow our 1200Kg Caravan plus gas bottles and all the other junk 270 miles to Newquay in Cornwall with Mrs VXL V6's DTi estate with ease, no problem going over Bodmin and the thing is very reliable, we use a shade over half a tank. When we go down later in the year (we leave the caravan down there all season) solo we obviously go down at a much faster pace.... fuel used - half a tank.


Logged

Boiler Man

  • Intermediate Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • Sale, Manchester
  • Posts: 368
    • View Profile
Re: omega 2.5 diesel verses 2.2 diesel
« Reply #16 on: 16 March 2012, 10:29:08 »

Everyone is forgetting the rare 2.0 Dti Omega Estate, like my first.

Never towed with it, but going off the poor accelaration. It proberbly couldn't pull the skin of a Rice Puddin :)

Logged
Omega 2.0 DTI GLS Estate 99 Gold & Omega 2.2 DTI CDX Estate 03 Silver. Just need a Bronze one now for the full set.

VXL V6

  • Omega Lord
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • Warwickshire
  • Posts: 9870
    • 530D M Sport, Elite 3.2
    • View Profile
Re: omega 2.5 diesel verses 2.2 diesel
« Reply #17 on: 16 March 2012, 10:42:10 »

Everyone is forgetting the rare 2.0 Dti Omega Estate, like my first.

Never towed with it, but going off the poor accelaration. It proberbly couldn't pull the skin of a Rice Puddin :)

If I had one criticism of the 2.2DTi is the start from nothing, if you load the revs up it's fine but who wants to start off like that every time. If you decat them though they are much improved.

Logged

John-R

  • Junior Member
  • **
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • Liverpool
  • Posts: 111
    • 2003 2.6 V6 CD
    • View Profile
Re: omega 2.5 diesel verses 2.2 diesel
« Reply #18 on: 16 March 2012, 12:34:47 »

I used to tow a 1400kg van with a 2.2Dti with 4 up and the awning etc in the boot. No probs to Plymouth and in France. Averaged 30-35mpg towing.
Tow the same van now with a 2.6 V6 auto and again no problem - would prefer the diesel economy though.
One thing crossed my mind though. You say you're towing a "big twin-axle". Might be worth checking your weights as you don't want the "tail wagging the dog". I'm sure you've thought about this though.
Happy Trails ! !
Logged
You can pick your friends and you can pick your nose . . but you can't pick your friends nose !

Keith ABS

  • Omega Baron
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • Maldon Essex
  • Posts: 2931
    • View Profile
Re: omega 2.5 diesel verses 2.2 diesel
« Reply #19 on: 16 March 2012, 17:43:46 »

   I can definatly go with the poor fuel consumption with the 2.5 with auto box. I have an average over the last 35k and have 32.2 in standard spec. Cant fault the car otherwise. Keith B
Logged
Pages: 1 [2]  All   Go Up
 

Page created in 0.041 seconds with 20 queries.