The way I see it, is this.
On this run, on petrol, I would have got 32mpg. No if's or buts - I've done that sort of route many times, and calculated that economy myself (not relying on mid).
So - If I do the trip I described on petrol, at 32mpg:
380 miles, at 32 mpg, requires 11.88 gallons - which is 54.03 litres. At 131.9p per litre, this is £71.27, which works out at 18.75p per mile
If I do the trip described on LPG, at 22mpg:
380 miles, at 22mpg, requires 17.27 gallons - which is 78.59 litres. At 77.0p per litre (cost of LPG here) this is £61.22, which works out at 16.11p per mile
SO over the course of the trip, I have saved £10.05
For each mile running on LPG, I save 2.64 pence
Surely this highlights, the LPG saving, is not *THAT* good, anymore?
I know for sure some will say 32mpg is too optimistic - it's not - I know my car, and I know this is what it would do.
Seems that, on the above figures, 31.25% is the economy loss on gas. Is the general concensus not 10 to 15%?
Maybe something is up with my LPG?
No faults in the engine ECU, runs like a dream on either fuel.
Hence asking for your comparisons

Cheers,
James