It could be argued-well educated,particularily in leadership? did churchill go to school there?
Btw,Im not a Tory and I think Cameron is a bit of a tw*t,but I feel there is a bit of inverted snobbery going on here. 
No Albs, he went to Harrow from 1888 to 1892.
There is nothing wrong with Eton or Harrow, which have steadily produced the leaders this country has required at crucial times in history.
It is only jealousy and snobbery that ignores the fact these are great learning institutions, which if you had the money you would want your children to attend.
The problem is that you need money to give your child the best education possible, and that is the shame of our non-meritocractic education system, which holds back working and middle class children.
The answer to this problem imo is grammar schools,we are lucky to still have a few in Essex,and both of my children benifited from the superb education offered by them,they were all but wiped out in most of the uk by the socialist dumbing down educational policies and have denied many bright children from "ordinary" backgrounds the chance to better themselves.Nowadays bright kids usually have to go to comprehensives were almost everyone is taught to exactly the same low standard,so the talented kids are left bored and unfulfilled.
I dont see why they cant be re-introduced but rebranded as some kind of special needs schools,after all if the kids at one end of the spectrum are classed as special needs,and seperated out from the mainstream in order to fulfill their particular requirements,then why cant the kids at the other end of the spectrum have the same thinking applied to their needs.
The big problem with socialists is that they think we are all the same (when it suits them) but we arent.
Rant over.
