Che was a real cool dude etc.but he helped to create the "socialist utopia" in Cuba,where the citizens arent allowed to leave the country because if they do they wont come back,and many of them risk their lives by constructing makeshift boats and trying to sail to Miami in the good old U.S-home of the "great satan" capitalism. 
......stickin' out big lad - the following might shed a bit of light on that.....
[media]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iQcUkd1w_TY[/media]
Great link, Zulu. 
Definitely not a nice bloke. 
without looking at the circumstances - if i was at war and killed an enemy - would that make me a murderer? you have to remember he lived an extraordinary life, fighting injustice, fighting to relieve people of poverty and overthrow tyrannical governments with guerilla warfare - its not pleasant, never has been and never will be - sometimes the ends justify the means. i'd put him up with any great leader you care to mention.
how many died under churchills orders? or blairs? or thatchers?
seems that the ends justify the means in some causes.
we have difficulty in judging a man so single minded in purpose and action as to be obsessive and insane to our eyes, we who live in modern western society - built on the sweat and labour of the oppressed Che spent his life defending
wow.......we've really gone off topic on this one - i just thought the 10 worst cars were actually some of the best!!

...indeed bannjaxx - remember - the freedom of the open road to the soundtrack of a Northstar V8 - that's life worth living
i'm surprised you fall into the trap of condemning a mans behaviour ...forgive me for that, don't forget I've been a functionary of the state for more time than I care to remember, so condemnation lies well within my capability, however, I do have balance and don't accept that all things 'Whitehall' is necessarily the only tenet by which one's opinion should be guided.
you have to remember he lived an extraordinary life, fighting injustice, fighting to relieve people of poverty and overthrow tyrannical governments with guerrilla warfare .....as many have done, there
is a fine line however between fighting for justice and adopting a dictatorial stance when that ideal is questioned by the very people you're supposedly fighting for. This happens to some extent or other in most cases I would suggest.
blairs...this self-serving gutless individual can never be justifiably referred to a leader worthy of note.
seems that the ends justify the means in some causes.
we have difficulty in judging a man so single minded in purpose and action as to be obsessive and insane to our eyes, we who live in modern western society - built on the sweat and labour of the oppressed Che spent his life defending.......the assertion that the ends will always justify the means is open to question bannjaxx - it depends upon the values by which it is judged, and on many occasions, the use of this statement has lessened the impact of some very questionable acts.
When single-minded individuals decide to involve themselves in the overthrow of the status quo - for whatever reason- the risk of their becoming dictatorial and oppressive to their fellow countrymen/women is more than possible.
......did his contribution make any real difference - is Cuba considered to be a better place, a beacon for the net result of revolution? I'm unsure. I do admit that the shunning of the island by consecutive US administrations has not helped, but in general, the basic tenet of the communistic ideal will always fail to gain traction, as most people remain individuals, and where this ideal is enforced, the only people to suffer are those who are touted as being the reason for that very ideal to be held in the first place.
.......some of the most oppressive regimes in recent history have been established through the desire for communist revolution.
I do realise that I must appear to be rather an enigma, an establishment figure who can embrace some decidedly non-establishment ideas. Isn’t that what free thinking all about? That’s the advantage of living in a relatively free society where such thinking is not considered to be a threat to the state – for the moment at least.