The John Barnes thing made me think of the black footballing heroes of my past and the Big Ron "racist" inncident. I'm a West Brom fan and still clearly remmember the abuse that our "three degrees" (another term meant to be affectionate but stemming from racism in todays pc world?) , Brendon Batson, the late great Laurie Cunningham and, of course, Cyrille Regis had to endure. If you want to see it yourself again (along with some superb football that shows us that, good as The winker and co are ,they aint that much better than previous teams) watch the albions classic 5-3 win over man utd on you-tube. In those days there was a lot of nasty racism that was what might be called "active" racism. But there was also a lot of more "passive" racism that was mostly down to ignorance and culture of the time. Big Ron is an example of this, but mustnt be forgotten that it was really down to him that black players were given the opportunity to shine in English football. Racism is more complicated than a lot of people think and at heart it is no different than what Reich wrote about as the "narcissm of small differences". This is about how the majority of people want to belong to a group (initially for safety). The way to identify who is in the group and who is not is not so much by id similarities, but rather picking on the differences. the more obvious ones are sex, colour or race, but you then get the same happening within the group, which might be accent (eg geordie/ scouse/ brummie etc) and then maybe size (fat/skinny) or hair colour(red/ blonde etc)or maybe gang or what football team you support, whatever, anything that is different. As for me, I dont care what sex, colour or nationality you are, we cant change that. But things like attitude, behaviour, polotics and beliefs. These are things I can challenge.
jerry